Skip to content

Law · Accounting · Property · Anyone drowning in documents

Halve the time on your most repeateddocument task.Or don't pay.

We build AI that reads the documents you receive over and over — and pulls out the fields you always hunt for. With a source on every line.

5 working days. No obligation.

  • Data stays in the EU
  • You approve everything
  • DPA before we start

The maths

What is the repetition costing you?

Your numbers. Not ours.

15 hours
1,200 DKK

That costs you per year

828,000kr.

Half of it is 414,000 kr. a year — back into billable work.

Get it halved

Simple maths: hours × rate × 46 working weeks. It doesn't replace an analysis — that's what the audit is for.

The difference

Same document. Two Mondays.

Today

With Sarpol

40 minutes per document
40 seconds
A lawyer reads 14 pages to find 6 fields
6 fields, each with page and clause
Errors surface at the client
Errors caught in the approval queue
“Who had that matter?”
Full log on every lookup
Overtime in peak season
Same team, double the capacity

Who

If you're reading the same document for the tenth time, you're the one.

Law firms

01 → ∞

Parties, deadlines, liability caps, termination, jurisdiction.

Accountants and bookkeepers

01 → ∞

Amount, date, supplier, VAT rate, account, counterparty.

Property and administration

01 → ∞

Rent, notice, indexation, encumbrances, easements, deposit.

Different industries. One pattern: same document type, same questions, every single time.

What you get

One workflow. Finished.

Not a platform to learn. One task, taken off your desk entirely.

  • 01

    Document audit

    Written analysis of your three documents: what can be extracted, what can't, and where the hours sit.

    Free
  • 02

    The agent, built on your material

    Trained on your document types, your fields, your terminology. Not a generic model with a prompt in front of it.

    Included
  • 03

    Approval queue with sources

    Every field points to page and clause. Nothing is sent, posted or filed without a person.

    Included
  • 04

    Gap and anomaly checks

    The agent flags what's missing or unusual — the unsigned page, the odd clause.

    Included
  • 05

    Setup, testing and training

    We connect it to mail, drive or case system and train your people. You build nothing.

    Included
  • 06

    Measured result, in writing

    Before and after on your own numbers. You know exactly what you got — or didn't.

    Included

The price

Fixed price. Agreed before we build.

No hourly billing. No invoice afterwards. You know the whole number, running costs included, before you say yes.

The guarantee

The Half Guarantee

We halve the time. Or you don't pay.

We agree the target in writing before we build anything — on your numbers, measured on your workflow.

Get a free audit
  1. 01

    If we miss the target on time we keep working at no extra cost until we hit it.

  2. 02

    If we still miss it 30 days later you get the full amount back.

  3. 03

    Either way you keep the analysis, the specification and everything we built.

And your time is covered too

We use at most 3 hours of your people's time across the whole engagement. If it takes more, that's our problem — not your invoice.

The terms are in writing before we start. We only give the guarantee on workflows whose documents we've seen — which is why everything begins with the audit.

The proof

Every answer points back to the page it came from.

That's the whole difference between a tool you dare use and one you don't. Click a field.

It does not advise. It does not judge. It finds, structures and highlights — the assessment stays with you.

lease_noerrebrogade_142.pdfReading

Extracted fields

Missing

No provision found covering maintenance of installations.

Awaiting your approval

Click a field to see its source

How

From email to running in four weeks.

  1. Day 1

    You send three documents

    Anonymised is perfectly fine.

  2. Day 5

    You get the analysis

    In writing. What can be automated, what it's worth, what it costs.

  3. Week 2

    First version runs

    On your own documents, at your firm.

  4. Week 4

    Measured and handed over

    Before and after on your numbers. The guarantee is settled here.

Security

Confidential client data. So it's here, not on page four.

Data stays in the EU

EU-hosted model and storage. Agreed in writing before the first upload.

Your material is not trained on

It's in the data processing agreement — not just on a website.

DPA first

Roles, purpose, retention, deletion and sub-processors, in writing.

Full audit log

Who ran what, when, on which document, and who approved it.

Testing on anonymised material

Real matters only once you're satisfied.

A human on it, every time

Approval is architecture, not a setting.

And one honest thing

We don't write “fully GDPR compliant”, because that isn't a property of software. It depends on the whole setup. We build with data minimisation, EU hosting, written agreements, logging and human approval from day one — and we say so out loud when something needs a legal assessment we can't give you.

Who builds it

Three disciplines. No middlemen.

Law

A lawyer keeping the solution inside professional secrecy and conduct rules.

Business

Does the maths on where the hours sit, so we build what moves the needle.

Engineering

Builds and runs the agents. Responsible for output being verifiable.

We're a new firm looking for the first Danish firms to run real engagements with. That's why the audit is free — and why we dare give the guarantee.

Objections

What you're thinking right now

Yes, if the setup is right — and the setup is the work. There has to be a legal basis, a data processing agreement, data has to stay where you agreed, and a human has to approve before anything has consequences. The final call in your firm is yours; for lawyers it's also a question of professional secrecy. We'll help prepare the documentation, but we don't give the legal sign-off.

Sometimes it will. That's why every field carries a source reference, why the agent says “I'm unsure” rather than guessing, and why a human approves everything. The goal isn't a flawless machine — it's a flow where an error is cheap to catch.

That we only give it on workflows whose documents we've seen. We agree the target in writing before building, and we don't pick a target we don't believe in. If there isn't enough repetition for us to guarantee anything, we say so in the analysis — and you've saved the money.

No. It wraps around mail, drive, case system and accounting system. Where there's no integration, it runs off a mailbox and a folder. That's enough to start and get it measured.

No. Short decision paths and just as much repetition. If one person spends ten hours a week on the same document, there's something to gain.

The audit is free. After that, a fixed price on the specific workflow once we know what's being built — running costs included, so you know the whole number. We price by solution, not by the hour.

Three documents. Five working days. Zero risk.

Worst case: you get a written analysis of where your time actually goes.

Get my free audit